Journal Analysis
As the title of the journal notes, “Spider-Man in Love: A Psychoanalytic
Interpretation” is exactly what the title describes; a psychoanalytical
interpretation of the 2002 film “Spiderman”
directed by Sam Raimi. The author
Richard L. Kaplan divulges into deep psychoanalytic theories regarding the
film. He explores the role of hypermasculinity, the “father” complex, and the Oedipal
Complex. He brilliantly dissects the movie and correlates them to hypermasculinity,
the “father” complex, and the Oedipal Complex. He exposes genre patterns, and
gender roles in the film. This brief analysis of Richard L. Kaplan’s “Spider-Man in Love: A Psychoanalytic
Interpretation” will summarize his findings; show my viewpoints on his
findings, and the relevance I find in them.
Being the naïve reader that I am, I
searched for an article that would have some meaning and interest to my taste.
I have always had a love for anything superhero related. So when scrolling
through the “Journal for Popular Culture”,
I came across the word Spiderman. I immediately downloaded the article;
emailed it to my instructor, without ever glancing at the entire title or
reading the article itself, an action I should have taken. After reading the
article, much to my surprise, I was completely baffled; this article was not
what I expected.
As I noted before I was baffled, not
upset. Upon reading the introduction I find myself intrigued, as he notes that
“Spiderman” is a love story in disguise. He goes on to tell how the classic
formula: boy meets girl, then loses her, saves the world, wins the public’s
acclaim, and captures his love, is broken, and instead ends in tears with love
stimulated but unrequited. (Kaplan, 2011). I am now seduced
into his article. I question myself, is “Spiderman”
not an action film? Was I tricked into watching a love story? And after
contemplating on it, I was. It was after the introduction that I found out what
I had gotten into: psychology!
Oh, the horrendous memories of taking
Introduction to Psychology from sophomore year. (Just a note, I am an
accountant) I had to remember what Freud’s five stages of psychosexual
development were. I had to “wiki” several complexes, and use the dictionary for
some of the vocabulary used. Before I go into any summarizations, I need to
describe some terms. The Oedipal complex is a complex of males; desire to
possess the mother sexually and to exclude the father; said to be a source of
personality disorders if unresolved. (Farlex, Inc, 2012) Hypermasculinity is a psychological term for the
exaggeration of male stereotypical behavior, such as an emphasis on strength,
aggression, body hair, odor, and virility. (Farlex, Inc, 2012) The “father
complex” is a term I; myself use to describe any psychological problems
caused from having an inadequate, or absent father. Now that you have an
understanding of these terms, I can start my summary.
The Summary
Kaplan’s article describes the
hypermasculinty of the villains, Mary Jane’s boyfriends, and her father. He goes on to talk about how these villains
and other men have been neglected of the softening, socializing effect of women
and or family. This serves as the threatening image of the male within the
pervasive American beliefs about masculinity. This has become known in popular
culture throughout history, and is prevalent in melodrama. Kaplan quotes that “this
fear of men echoes one part of the traditional oedipal fantasy: the bad
menacing father, the arbitrary vindictive older man who stands outside the requirements
of morality and social compassion”. (Kaplan, 2011) His article
describes the attributes of Peter Parker, AKA Spiderman, and how he does not
fit this hypermasculine stereotype, and later because of this wins the heart of
the beautiful Mary Jane Watson.
Let us not forget what intrigued me about this
article; that this film is a deviance from other love stories. Parker is
depicted as the softened male, who has feelings and compassions. He is not the
stereotypical, hypermasculine action hero that we have all come to know. He is
soft and empathetic. He is human, with flaws, but has compassion; this
eventually trumps the other males in the film. However Parker is also Spiderman
and is continuously battling the hypermasculine villain, internally and
externally. This hardens Parker, his empathy and compassions start to slip
away, and become replaced with feelings of fatherly instincts; protection. (Kaplan, 2011) Parker ends his
relationship with Mary Jane, in fear of her being hurt. He has transitioned
himself from lover to protector, i.e. “father”. The Oedipal Complex has as much
to do with maturing and replacing your father’s role in life as sexually
desiring your mother. Mary Jane’s interactions with menacing men reinforce the
desires for Parker to protect her. Her father was abusive, her first boyfriend
was a “jerk”, and her rebound was non supportive. His article goes on in
greater detail how these conditions all interact with each other.
My Viewpoints and the Relevance of
the Article
In my opinion the article is very
well written with the exception of one flaw, the author misspells Mary Jane’s
last name, Watson. With her being a very important topic in the story, I find
this to be a horrible mistake. I believe this article was written for students,
professors, and scholars of the psychology field. This article used a lot of
technical jargon and psychoanalytical theory. This article required side
research for me to fully comprehend its points.
I find the only relevance of this article is to stimulate those groups
of people I mentioned earlier. As a general film viewer this article went into
too much detail and for some who have brash feelings against any type of
incest, may reject the oedipal complex, and be turned away from this film.
References
Farlex, Inc. (2012). The Free Dictionary .
Retrieved August 29, 2012, from
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/Oedipal+complex
Kaplan, R. (2011).
Spider-Man in Love: A Psychoanalytic Interpretation. Journal of Popular
Culture , 291-292.